ReviewReviewReviewReviewReviewDie Hard 4.0Jul 6, '07 4:43 PM
for everyone
Category:Movies
Genre: Action & Adventure
Die Hard 4.0 is the best Non-Stop Action flick I’ve seen for 2007. The film has a good balance of imaginative story telling, fantastic action sequences, witty humor and seamless CGI.

The film’s storyline begins when a terrorist plot is in set in motion to take down the entire computer and technological structure that supports the economy of the United States.

Through a series of fortunate or unfortunate events (depending on how you view it), "old school" hero and police detective John McClane (Bruce Willis) is assigned to pick-up for questioning one of the suspected civilian hackers, Matt Farrell (Justin Long) who is unknowingly an accessory to the terrorist plot.

As the virtual doomsday starts to take over and threaten the U.S. stock markets, traffic systems and network infrastructure, it’s up to the heroism of John McClane, aided by young hacker Matt Farrell, to stay ahead of the cyber-terrorists and put a stop to the impending downfall of the world’s biggest economy.


• Imaginative Self-Contained Story. The way the story was presented was very straightforward and the viewer/s need-not-see the previous Die Hard flicks to be able to understand this fourth installment. Each scene was beautifully stitched together leaving no room for any story loopholes.
• Fantastic Action Sequences. The fight choreographies for this movie may not be at par with other great Kung-Fu movies but most of the fight scenes were definitely entertaining. The fight scene between Maggie Q and Bruce Willis seem awkwardly funny but it has a certain coolness to it in terms of choreography.
• Spectacular Stunts & CGI. There are tons of great stunts in Die Hard 4.0 but I found it difficult to tell which ones where made with real stunt men, practical, CG or miniature effects. My personal favorite scenes are: (1) Bruce Willis crashing a car into a helicopter and (2) John McClane versus an F-35 Lightning II Jet. These action sequences may be unrealistic but the film execution was definitely jaw-dropping that you tend to suspend any disbelief you have and just enjoy the awesome-ness of it all.
• Muted Colors. I loved the way director Len Wiseman desaturated the colors of the movie. It definitely heightened the doomsday feel of the impending cyber-terrorism threat.
• Kevin Smith. If you’ve seen Mallrats, Dogma, and Clerks then you’ve probably seen Kevin Smith. He actually plays the role of Silent Bob opposite a dope-sniffing partner named Jay. He’s also a comic-book writer for a couple of Marvel titles which include Marvel Knight’s Daredevil. Kevin’s role as “Warlock” in Die Hard 4.0 may not be big but seeing him in this flick just added a smile to my comic-geeky persona.


• Unrealistic Plotline. The root cause of John McClane’s dilemma in this film is the Cyber-Terrorist Plot referred to in the film as a “Firesale”. The terrorist’s goal was to cripple the entire computer-based network of America, which happens to automatically back-up the entire U.S. economy on a single super-computer at NSA headquarters in the event of a nationwide Firesale. However, while it is true that the whole process of backing-up data automatically is technologically viable, the film’s premise of the U.S. government having a single back-up computer for everything is far-fetched and utterly idiotic. If this is how the U.S. really stores their data and the government does not have any redundant back-ups then I guess the idea of a “Firesale” threat would really be imminent.


This film definitely paints a scary picture of our growing dependency on computer-based systems. The impending threat that a “firesale” poses to society is so massive that it makes us feel like we’d want to go back to the Stone Age. But of course, this is just Hollywood telling a story and we just have to take everything presented based on its entertainment value. Despite the unrealistic plot, I could honestly say that I was totally entertained by Die Hard 4.0. I highly recommend seeing this flick in widescreen view to be able to appreciate the spectacular stunts and effects it has to offer. Five Bottlecaps on my book!


ryderaquino wrote on Jul 11, '07, edited on Jul 11, '07
ReviewReviewReview
just watched last night cuz' everyone was watching some movie about a wizard... anyway, i liked it, but felt somehow distracted by the tech-plot. like, 'hey they can DO that?' then they try to explain it hollywood style, and i end up not getting it. its cool that the terrorists can do all that stuff as it heightens their threat, but it was hard following all that techno-jumble like john mclane was trying too! also, i can't believe a single new york cop can be more effecient than the CIA, FBI, or CTU (if it's real)... overall, i thought the movie was an excuse for action... like the truck vs plane scene, it was cool and expensive, but i guess i'd prefer the twists and turns of 24 than overblown action scenes, but that's just me. i was halfway expecting the truck to transform into ultra magnus and the plane into the real starscream, but hey, you can't have everything! the ending was kinda anti-climatic considering all the ellaborate action... also, there seemed to be a greater sense of threat in the 1st movie than this, even though its nationwide terror... i guess its more intimate and believable if the threat isn't so grande. oh, yeah kevin smith was great, i thought he'd do something cooler in the end than just connect mclane to the uber-inefficient government dude, but it's ok. oh and lucy mclane is hot, and WAY more badass than perennial damsel in distress kim bauer. the question is, who's the bigger badass, jack bauer or john mclane?

actual rating: 3.5 stars
bleau72 wrote on Jul 12, '07, edited on Aug 11, '07
I agree with you that the CIA, FBI and NSA were very inefficient. But as I said in my review, John McClaine happens to be at the right p[lace at the right time every single time something significant is about to happen. He's basically not more efficient than the other agencies, like Jack Bauer, John McClaine seems to be the reluctant hero forced into a difficult situation wherein he has to act heroically. There's even a conversation about that in this film. I believe Die Hard 4.0 is not for everyone to appreciate, but those who love Action flicks will definitely enjoy this. As for the ending, I disagree with you when you say it's anti-climactic, the terrorist mastermind is not supposed to be a good fighter coz he's supposed to be just a smart-ass. So no spectacular fight scene could really happen between him and John McClaine. But you'd have to admit that John McClaine versus a Fighter Jet was pretty cool! It maybe stupidly unbelievable but it's definitely a great action sequence! =)
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 12, '07
yeah, it's a popcorn flick f' sho (sorry for the black jargon, hehe). you have a point with the ending, the main villain was indeed a pussy... and after that plane scene, anything grander would've been exhausting! for a moment there, i thought john was gunna pilot the plane and kick ass ala Arnie in 'True Lies'. come to think of it, 'true lies' was one of the funniest, most action-packed, and satisfying flicks to come around!

oh, and i was expecting justin long to talk about how great a mac was during his techno ramble! haha
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 18, '07
The Critique eh?! The Verdict rocks over the Critique. bwahaha!
bleau72 wrote on Jul 18, '07, edited on Aug 11, '07
The Verdict sounds too Judgemental.....I hate being Judgemental! =)
ryderaquino wrote on Jul 18, '07
lahat naman ng review subjective to your opinions! there's no such thing as an objective review...XD
bleau72 wrote on Jul 18, '07
lahat naman ng review subjective to your opinions! there's no such thing as an objective review...XD
I agree with that statement! =)
Add a Comment
How would you rate this movie? (optional)
   
© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help